![]() ![]() ![]() Philosopher 5 picks up chopstick 5, eats. However, if the lower number rule is in effect, he/she has to pick up chopstick 1 first, and it is already in use, so he/she is blocked. ![]() I have two indexes, and the report wants a shared KEY lock on both of them, while the update query wants an exclusive KEY lock on both of them, and somehow each query only manages to get one of the keys, so neither can proceed. Dimensions (L x W x H): 4.3 x 3.3 x 5.5 inches Connectivity: No Access codes: Up to 19 Security: Grade 2 Options: 7 finishes 2 styles For about 30 more than the basic single. Philosopher 1 is hungry, and without this assumption, would pick up chopstick 5, thus causing deadlock. I have two queries: a long running report with alot of joins and subqueries that pulls data according to two different dates on a base table, and a quick update query, which updates those same dates on that base table. I have diagnosed a deadlock problem in my sql server using the deadlock graph in SQL Server 2008. Supplied in either Chrome or Brass effect finishes complete with 2 keys per lock 36 key combinations. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |